test: increase timeout in test_human_readable_logs.py#11972
test: increase timeout in test_human_readable_logs.py#11972borisstoyanov merged 1 commit intoapache:mainfrom
Conversation
|
@blueorangutan package |
|
@weizhouapache a [SL] Jenkins job has been kicked to build packages. It will be bundled with KVM, XenServer and VMware SystemVM templates. I'll keep you posted as I make progress. |
DaanHoogland
left a comment
There was a problem hiding this comment.
clgtm, though a bit of a workaround rather then a definite solution, which is alright for test code.
Codecov Report✅ All modified and coverable lines are covered by tests. Additional details and impacted files@@ Coverage Diff @@
## main #11972 +/- ##
============================================
- Coverage 17.56% 17.56% -0.01%
- Complexity 15543 15545 +2
============================================
Files 5909 5909
Lines 529056 529056
Branches 64617 64617
============================================
- Hits 92947 92946 -1
- Misses 425654 425655 +1
Partials 10455 10455
Flags with carried forward coverage won't be shown. Click here to find out more. ☔ View full report in Codecov by Sentry. 🚀 New features to boost your workflow:
|
|
Packaging result [SF]: ✔️ el8 ✔️ el9 ✔️ el10 ✔️ debian ✔️ suse15. SL-JID 15631 |
|
@blueorangutan test |
|
@weizhouapache a [SL] Trillian-Jenkins test job (ol8 mgmt + kvm-ol8) has been kicked to run smoke tests |
|
[SF] Trillian test result (tid-14770)
|
|
@weizhouapache should we consider this PR and still valid ? |
ah yes. thanks @harikrishna-patnala for heads-up |
Description
This PR...
Types of changes
Feature/Enhancement Scale or Bug Severity
Feature/Enhancement Scale
Bug Severity
Screenshots (if appropriate):
How Has This Been Tested?
How did you try to break this feature and the system with this change?